<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who Owns Comments?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://misstuned.com/2008/06/27/who-owns-comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://misstuned.com/2008/06/27/who-owns-comments/</link>
	<description>Has surprisingly little to do with music...</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 07:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mari</title>
		<link>http://misstuned.com/2008/06/27/who-owns-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-2744</link>
		<dc:creator>Mari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 09:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://misstuned.com/?p=507#comment-2744</guid>
		<description>@Aaron

Yeah, I never delete comments just for having opposing opinions either.  However, sometimes those people who have different opinions than me decide to be childish gits about it and call names in the same breath that they express their opinion.  When they do that, that puts me in a difficult situation - to recognize their right to freedom of speech (because if they deleted my comment just for having an opposing opinion, I'd think that unfair), or to not be insulted mindlessly on my own website.  Fortunately I've grown a bit of a thicker skin, so I can let childish insults go a little better than some percent of younger site owners.  I find it very difficult to draw the line between when they're saying something different and just being stupid when insults or namecalling are found in their comment.

Exactly.  I guess that's what I'm getting at, but for me it's more of a childish, "If you've apologized and don't want to look a right moron anymore, I'll delete your mean and nasty comment.  However, if you're still a jerk, I'll leave it up there and poke fun at you."  I guess that's how a lot of site owners would react, but I still feel rather childish for feeling that way about situations like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Aaron</p>
<p>Yeah, I never delete comments just for having opposing opinions either.  However, sometimes those people who have different opinions than me decide to be childish gits about it and call names in the same breath that they express their opinion.  When they do that, that puts me in a difficult situation - to recognize their right to freedom of speech (because if they deleted my comment just for having an opposing opinion, I&#8217;d think that unfair), or to not be insulted mindlessly on my own website.  Fortunately I&#8217;ve grown a bit of a thicker skin, so I can let childish insults go a little better than some percent of younger site owners.  I find it very difficult to draw the line between when they&#8217;re saying something different and just being stupid when insults or namecalling are found in their comment.</p>
<p>Exactly.  I guess that&#8217;s what I&#8217;m getting at, but for me it&#8217;s more of a childish, &#8220;If you&#8217;ve apologized and don&#8217;t want to look a right moron anymore, I&#8217;ll delete your mean and nasty comment.  However, if you&#8217;re still a jerk, I&#8217;ll leave it up there and poke fun at you.&#8221;  I guess that&#8217;s how a lot of site owners would react, but I still feel rather childish for feeling that way about situations like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mari</title>
		<link>http://misstuned.com/2008/06/27/who-owns-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-2743</link>
		<dc:creator>Mari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 09:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://misstuned.com/?p=507#comment-2743</guid>
		<description>@Jaclyn

I always thought that way too.  Sites with overly aggressive, "You submit this and I can say it's on my site I own the rights to it" TOS's were full of bull.  They're still my words, even if I loaned them to the site owner.  It's like a research paper.  Just because you incorporate someone else's idea into your own hypothesis doesn't make it yours.  You gotta give credit where credit is due.

Oh, and btw, I edited your comment.  You had the small tag in code tags, but everything on this site between code tags gets automatically escaped, so it was displaying like &lt;code&gt;&#60; small &#62;&lt;/code&gt; rather than like &#60;small&#62;.  It was essentially being double-escaped.  (I should probably note that everything between code tags is auto-escaped in the magic WP-generated XHTML tags paragraph, huh?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jaclyn</p>
<p>I always thought that way too.  Sites with overly aggressive, &#8220;You submit this and I can say it&#8217;s on my site I own the rights to it&#8221; TOS&#8217;s were full of bull.  They&#8217;re still my words, even if I loaned them to the site owner.  It&#8217;s like a research paper.  Just because you incorporate someone else&#8217;s idea into your own hypothesis doesn&#8217;t make it yours.  You gotta give credit where credit is due.</p>
<p>Oh, and btw, I edited your comment.  You had the small tag in code tags, but everything on this site between code tags gets automatically escaped, so it was displaying like <code>&amp;lt; small &amp;gt;</code> rather than like &lt;small&gt;.  It was essentially being double-escaped.  (I should probably note that everything between code tags is auto-escaped in the magic WP-generated XHTML tags paragraph, huh?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://misstuned.com/2008/06/27/who-owns-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-2742</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 02:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://misstuned.com/?p=507#comment-2742</guid>
		<description>When I had a website with a comment policy, I made it very clear that I was to approve of the comments before they were displayed. I always let through comments with different opinions because that's more interesting than a bunch of comments that say "I Agree". There is a difference, though, between having a different opinion and just being a jerk.

Commenters own their words to a certain extent. It's kind of like school. You have your rights, but they (teachers) are allowed to infringe on some of them. If a commenter really wanted their comment revoked from my site, I would remove it if they had a good reason. I feel, though, that if I don't want to remove it, than I shouldn't necessarily have to. The commenter owns their words, but you own the space it's being displayed on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I had a website with a comment policy, I made it very clear that I was to approve of the comments before they were displayed. I always let through comments with different opinions because that&#8217;s more interesting than a bunch of comments that say &#8220;I Agree&#8221;. There is a difference, though, between having a different opinion and just being a jerk.</p>
<p>Commenters own their words to a certain extent. It&#8217;s kind of like school. You have your rights, but they (teachers) are allowed to infringe on some of them. If a commenter really wanted their comment revoked from my site, I would remove it if they had a good reason. I feel, though, that if I don&#8217;t want to remove it, than I shouldn&#8217;t necessarily have to. The commenter owns their words, but you own the space it&#8217;s being displayed on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaclyn</title>
		<link>http://misstuned.com/2008/06/27/who-owns-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-2741</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaclyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 22:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://misstuned.com/?p=507#comment-2741</guid>
		<description>I think commenter's should own their words, no site should have the power to "steal" their ownership. Comments are written opinions so I believe no one has the right to own someone else's opinion. I think grammatical errors can be fixed but maybe still have the unedited text on the comment, maybe in between &#60;small&#62; tags. Just a thought. Anyway, the author does have the option to delete the comment if it's rude or something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think commenter&#8217;s should own their words, no site should have the power to &#8220;steal&#8221; their ownership. Comments are written opinions so I believe no one has the right to own someone else&#8217;s opinion. I think grammatical errors can be fixed but maybe still have the unedited text on the comment, maybe in between &lt;small&gt; tags. Just a thought. Anyway, the author does have the option to delete the comment if it&#8217;s rude or something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
